Blind Review Process

To ensure transparency, accountability, and high-quality submissions, ICoDiT 2026 implements the following review process:

1. Two-Phase Review
   Each manuscript undergoes two review phases:
   • Desk Evaluation – Manuscripts are checked for compliance with the conference topics and formatting guidelines, as well as for similarity and AI-generated content using Turnitin. Manuscripts with a similarity index above 20% or AI-generated content probability over 50% will be rejected and will not proceed to peer review.
   • Peer Review – Manuscripts passing the desk evaluation are reviewed by at least two independent reviewers. Reviewers assess the scientific quality, originality, and relevance of the paper.
2. Decision Notification
   All authors will be informed of the review results on the scheduled notification date, including decisions made at the desk evaluation stage.
3. Revisions for Accepted Papers
   Accepted manuscripts must be revised to comply with the conference template and incorporate reviewers’ suggestions (if any). Revisions must be submitted before the final paper submission deadline. Failure to submit the revised manuscript may result in the retraction of acceptance.
4. Final Submission and Publication Preparation
   After the final submission, manuscripts will be prepared for publication. During this stage, the Track Director may contact authors to request minor adjustments. If no changes are requested, the manuscript will be edited and finalized by the Track Director for publication.